Pacific Rim leaders to debate future of trade post-Trump


 

By Rosalba O’Brien and Teresa Cespedes

 

(Reuters- LIMA) Leaders of Pacific rim nations began gathering in Peru on Friday seeking to salvage hopes for regional trade as prospects of a Donald Trump presidency sounded a possible death knell for the U.S-led Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) free trade pact.

Discussions between the 21 members of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit will be dominated by fears of rising anti-globalization sentiment in the West, where many worry about losing jobs to low-wage economies, and China’s burgeoning role in global trade.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry (R) leave after their bilateral meeting at the APEC Ministers Summit in Lima, Peru November 17, 2016.   REUTERS/Mark Ralston/Pool

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry (R) leave after their bilateral meeting at the APEC Ministers Summit in Lima, Peru November 17, 2016. REUTERS/Mark Ralston/Pool

“The leaders will meet on Sunday and the first thing will be this very issue (anti-globalization),” Alan Bollard, the APEC secretariat’s executive director, told Reuters in an interview on Thursday.

U.S. President Barack Obama, Chinese President Xi Jinping, and Russian President Vladimir Putin are due to attend the summit that brings together leaders whose economies represent 57 percent of global gross domestic product.

While campaigning, President-elect Trump had labeled the TPP “a disaster” and his populist stance on trade issues in some ways echoed sentiments heard in Britain, when it voted in June to quit the European Union.

Though Obama championed the TPP, his administration has stopped trying to win congressional approval for the deal that was signed by 12 economies in the Americas and Asia-Pacific, but excluded China.

Despite Trump’s antipathy toward the TPP, Bollard said it was premature to write it off, but he expected it to be shelved “for a year or so.”

 

 




Leave a Reply